If I had my own computerized radio disc jockey, I could program it with the very phrase in the title of this blog post and have it play it just about every day.
Today's focus of my ire, the time that esteemed body is spending trying to decide where "The City of Philadelphia" is pro-choice by, ironically, making that choice for everyone in Philadelphia.
So Blondell Reynolds Brown introduced a resolution (which passed) that said that Philadelphia is a pro-choice city. Now, Councilman Brian O'Neill wants a resolution that says Philadelphia is pro-choice and pro-life. If it passes, it seems like we'd be pretty much back to where we were before this whole fiasco started, except that we'd have a couple fancy proclamations (suitable for framing) to show for it.
I've got it, why don't the just pass a bill to put that question on the ballot so we can change the Charter? I wonder what the Committee of Seventy would say about that.
Comments (4)
Happy trails Dan ... You Philly guys have every bit of Blondell Reynolds Brown , Council Brian O'Neill and thoughts of placing the question on the ballot under the watchful eye of the Committee Of Seventy.
We guys in Montco are interested in D.A. Bruce Castor and Montco Commissioner Jim Matthews , who are running as a team for two of Montco's ( 3 ) county commissioner seats.
Posted by Jasper Zeigler Jr | June 15, 2007 10:10 AM
Idiot
Posted by Anonymous | June 17, 2007 11:16 PM
You have another chance on November 6th to clean out the dead wood in City Council.
Posted by Anonymous | June 18, 2007 9:39 PM
Anonymous :
The one question ahead. Will your message suggestion become adherence.
Posted by Jasper Zeigler Jr | June 19, 2007 9:39 AM