« Rattle to Exit Berlin? | Main | Cell Phones And The Symphony In An Uncivilized World »

Rattle-Philharmonic Relationship Murkier Than Ever

rattleNY.JPGReports coming out of Europe Friday have only added to the confusion over what sort of future Simon Rattle and the Berlin Philharmonic have together.
AFP quotes the Philharmonic's spokesman as saying that members "have spoken out in favour of extending the contract of its chief conductor Sir Simon Rattle which expires in 2012."
Rattle and the orchestra "will now discuss what their joint future might look like after 2012," the AFP story says.
Lukewarm affirmation, that. And it could mean almost anything - even phasing into a guest-conducting slot.
An AP story, though, paints a very different picture. A short piece with a Berlin dateline says the orchestra has only agreed to keep Rattle through 2012 - the end-date of his current contract.
Was there ever any question about that?
Bloomberg says Rattle will stay beyond 2012, but how far beyond has not been determined.
Strange that all these stories seem to be describing the future from the musicians' perspective, without questioning whether Rattle would agree to stay if asked.
The relevance of all this to Philadelphia could not be greater. The Philadelphia Orchestra's various search agents and committees have not indicated an official choice - official choices are not made until it's clear who is available - but there's no question that musicians and board members would love to see Rattle here in some capacity.
If he reduces his dates in Berlin after 2012, would he be free to become music director here - or maybe principal guest conductor?
If Rattle is tied up in Berlin, would Philadelphia turn to Vladimir Jurowski? Maybe while Charles Dutoit is in charge for the next four seasons, the orchestra could cultivate its relationship with Jurowski while signaling its seriousness with him via a principal guest conductor title. That's the way Muti became music director - after a period as principal guest.
Or does the Philadelphia Orchestra have the nerve to extend a music-director offer to Jurowski now? What a bad bit of timing it was that Jurowski had to cancel his dates here a few weeks ago. The orchestra would be in a much better position to act if it had that third program with Jurowski under its belt.
Is the orchestra developing a Plan A, B, C and D? Let's hope so. After Rattle and Jurowski, there's a big drop-off in terms of viable options.
President James Undercofler will only say that that the orchestra is "alert" to events unfolding in Berlin.
Possibly significant side note: Among the guest conductors in Berlin next season is Riccardo Muti, who hasn't conducted the Philharmonic in 17 years. Of course, for Muti, having his name on the schedule and actually showing up to conduct are independent concepts.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.phillynews.com/inquirer/mt-tb-trythis.cgi/6186.

Comments (3)

Barry:

I'm afraid the timing is off for Jurowski at this point because he's in his first year with the London Philharmonic. It could justifiably be viewed as a slap in the face by the LPO players should their new chief conductor already be looking to move on to a higher-profile job at the first opportunity. I doubt Jurowski would do that to them.

Giving private signals to him that there is interest for down the road is of course another story. I agree that he'd be a good choice. I just think they need to wait a while longer if that's who they want to ask.

Geo.:

FWIW, from the Berlin Phil's own web page, there is this pithy announcement, which translates with help from Google as follows:

"Orchestra opts for Rattle

25.04.2008

Berlin Philharmonic opt for a contract extension by Sir Simon Rattle.

The Berlin Philharmonic have opted for an extension of the current contract running until 2012 [of] its chief conductor Sir Simon Rattle.

The Berlin Philharmonic and Sir Simon Rattle will now exchange about how the common future might look like after 2012."

Agree with Barry about Jurowski, as it would be foolish to throw a monkey-wrench so suddenly in his relationship with the LPO, which almost comes off as a model way of how to develop a conductor-orchestra relationship. It really got started in 2001 when Jurowski became music director of Glyndebourne Opera, where the LPO is the principal orchestra. His debut with the LPO outside of Glyndebourne was an emergency sub job later that year, and in 2003, he became the LPO's principal guest conductor. Then, of course, he moved up to principal conductor in 2007.

Geo.:

The plot perhaps thins, per Charlotte Higgins' article in The Guardian on Rattle being re-elected the BPO's chief conductor:

"The vote from the Philharmonic's players gives him a further decade at the helm of the orchestra, with effect from this autumn."

The article doesn't explicitly mention dates, however, nor does the BPO website have an update as of yet.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

The Author

dorbin80.jpg

Peter Dobrin has been writing about classical music and the arts for The Inquirer since 1989. He earned an undergraduate degree in performance from the University of Miami, and received a master's degree in music criticism from the Peabody Institute of the Johns Hopkins University.

He’s grateful for news tips, willing to engage in a certain amount of back and forth with readers, but is unfortunately unable to remove old LPs from your basement or post photographs of your cat.


About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on April 25, 2008 3:43 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Rattle to Exit Berlin?.

The next post in this blog is Cell Phones And The Symphony In An Uncivilized World.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35