« In the campaign mail... | Main | Court: Farnese stays on ballot »

BPT Tax Cut For Some, Not For All?

Here's an idea that just might tantalize City Council members: go ahead and cut the business privilege tax, but ONLY for smaller businesses. The big corporations? Keep squeezing 'em.

That's the pitch One Philadelphia has made recently in a letter to council members. Only about 500 companies pay more than $100,000 a year, and those big guys account for about 55 percent of the city's total BPT take. If they were excluded from the BPT cuts Mayor Nutter's proposing, the city would save over $60 million a year (by 2015, when the proposed cuts would be fully in effect) -- or so argues One Philadelphia.

But if the whole idea of cutting the BPT is to attract businesses and grow jobs, what's the logic in excluding the big corporations from the deal? Is Philly only interested in small employers? One Philadelphia's answer: for the biggies, the BPT is nothing more than a "blip in their accounting records."

We bet the CEOs of those businesses would say otherwise.

In any event, expect this issue to come up next week, when Council will deign to open its doors to the public for open comment (only three public comment sessions are scheduled during this year's budget hearings).

Copyright © 2006-2008 Philadelphia Newspapers L.L.C. All Rights Reserved.

Post a comment

Philly.com discussions are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic.

These boards are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable to us in our sole discretion and to disclose any information necessary to satisfy the law, regulation, or government request. Personal attacks, especially on other board participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on April 8, 2008 5:29 PM.

The previous post in this blog was In the campaign mail....

The next post in this blog is Court: Farnese stays on ballot.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35