
Herbie Hancock?!
Usher seemed to know what was up when he told Kanye West that "there are no losers in this category" before the album of the year Grammy envelope was opened up at the Staples Center on Sunday. But Quincy Jones looked as surprised as the rest of America - and Hancock himself - when he announced that the 67 year old jazzman's River: The Joni Letters beat out the heavily favored twosome of Amy Winehouse's Back to Black and Kanye West' Graduation.
What exactly happened here? How did River come to be first jazz disc to win album of the year since Getz/Gilberto in 1965? And did it deserve to do so?
It's not that hard to fathom how River won, if you make yourself think like the Grammys do.
First, a little background: When The Joni Letters came out last fall, it didn't make much of a ripple in the pop cultural pond, not getting nearly as much attention as Shine, the new Joni Mitchell album that was the archetypal singer-songwriter's first album of new material in nine years. Shine also made news because, following in Paul McCartney's footsteps, Mitchell entered into a relationship to sell the album through Starbucks, the coffee chain that I just paid $9.99 to get Internet access to so I could drink my Citrus Monster and watch the snowflakes come down in Harrisburg while I type this blog item. But that's another story...
Shine, unfortunately, turned out to be a pretentious, pedantic disappointment. But The Joni Letters was anything but. Here's an excerpt from my review of the both of them together, which ran in September:
"[Shine]" is meant to be a thematically unified statement on everything wrong with the world, starting with "war, that's what history is for. " On the title cut, "rising oceans and evaporating seas" and "Frankenstein technologies," not to mention "worldwide traffic jams," are added to a laundry list of reasons not to be cheerful. It's an embittered, surprisingly nonpoetic approach. ...
River makes for a more nourishing listen, in part because Mitchell's old songs are better than her new ones. Jones sings "Court and Spark," Tina Turner stretches out with an assured "Edith and the Kingpin," and Corinne Bailey Rae turns in an able version of the title track, though that wintry soundscape has become a too-familiar staple on Christmas albums.
Hancock has been friendly with Mitchell since they worked together on her 1979 album Mingus, and the pianist treats her compositions with delicacy and sensitivity, with a band that includes Wayne Shorter on saxophone and Dave Holland on bass.
Shorter's "Nefertiti" and Duke Ellington's "Solitude" expand on an otherwise all-Mitchell program, and Leonard Cohen drops in for a closing spoken-word version of "The Jungle Line" to take the project out on a note of sepulchral weirdness. "
So that answers the 'is it any good?' question. The answer is yes, in an accessible jazz sort of way, full of melodic interpretations of much loved songs and excellent musicianship. If you go out and pick it up in a post-Grammy frenzy, and you like Mitchell, and Hancock, you'll be more than happy you made the purchase.
The "why-it-won" question is a little tricker. The Joni Letters didn't make anybody's best CDs of 2007 list, outside of the jazz realm that I know of, and it was certainly a surprise when it showed up among the nominees. But once it got into the running, it was the clear dark horse in the race. If I were in Vegas, I would have taken the long odds and put money down on it.
How come? Partly because with two clear favorites, there was real vote-splitting potential with Winehouse and West. As Hillary and Barack are to Democratic voters, Amy and Kanye were to Grammy choosers: Most people like them both, and would have been happy to vote for either one.
That opened up the possibility for a third way, and Hancock did better than John Edwards for a number of reasons. The Grammies like to give awards to older, respectable artists who deserve to be rewarded for the contributions of a lifetime. Take a look at album of the year winners in recent years: Tony Bennett in 1995, Bob Dylan in 1998, Santana in 2000, Steely Dan in 2001, U2 in 2005, Ray Charles in 2006, Hancock this year.
Other years, there have been consensus winners that combined obvious quality and commercial success: Lauryn Hill in 1999, OutKast in 2004. But this time, West and Winehouse broke that consensus in two, and Hancock stepped in.
He was able to pull it off not just because he's old and respectable and deserving of being rewarded for a career that's included great post-bop work with Miles Davis in the '60s and the 1983 pop hit "Rockit!," which also won a Grammy. He also won because he paid tribute to Mitchell. An esteemed elder statesman jazz artist honors an esteemed elder stateswoman singer-songwriter, and as if to curry favor with voters, gets Grammy fave Norah Jones to sing on it, too. It was a surprising choice for album of the year. But if you think about it, also a safe one.