
I don't feel too bad for Hannah Montana, Miley Cyrus and neither does my colleague, Karen Heller. By now you all know the teen country singer says she was duped into what she says were whack pictures taken by fashion photographer, Annie Leibovitz. The photos are to run in the June issue of Vanity Fair. I saw the pics all over the news Monday. Maybe Cyrus thought the artful nudes would be more demure than racy. She did have the allusion of wearing just a bedsheet. Nope. instead she was framed as a hungry, prepubescent sex pot. Of course Cyrus is more worried about her Disney image. But then you gotta ask: Why would she agree to pose nude? On the other side: Why would Leibovitz take such a picture of a 15-year-old in the first place?
This brings us to the serious issue of the rampant sexualization of young girls in the fashion industry. It keeps getting worse and it's more egregious than the overuse of too skinny models and lack of minorities in the fashion industry. Cyrus is just 15. We all know she's just 15. This is really slimy.
But it's not the Cyrus' of the world who are in danger. They are protected by bodyguards and fame won't be victimized like the story that broke today about the young Austrian woman who was repeatedly raped by her father from the age of 11 and bore him seven children. How could a man, let alone somebody's daddy, be turned on by his own little girl? I'm sure part of it has to do with these kinds of inappropriate images. What do you think?
Here is another question: We weren't even sure if we should post the images with this blog since were in fact, denouncing it. What do you think? If we had posted without the pic, would you have wanted to see them? Are people making too big of a deal?
Comments (2)
and even more shocking, her father was present during the photo shoot. But after seeing the way she was dressed while co-hosting the CMT awards with her father, perhaps this shouldn't be a surprise.
So let's start by asking what the hell are her parents thinking of.
And perhaps Ms. Liebovitz was turned on by tarting up the young Ms. Cyrus.
Posted by mark | April 29, 2008 2:26 AM
Posted on April 29, 2008 02:26
I think the only people to blame is the Cyrus family. They were there, they saw all the pictures, and any parents should have a problem with their 15 year old daughter posing even slightly nude.
Liebovitz is just a photographer, and a really good one. She's just looking to get the shot and probably has no moral connection to most of her subjects.
Posted by Bobbi Lee Hitchon | April 29, 2008 8:50 AM
Posted on April 29, 2008 08:50