« I stand corrected | Main | Opening the mailbag »

Headlines and crunchy numbers

We begin with breaking news from the Daily News that Penn State defensive end Jerome Hayes will miss the rest of the season with a torn ACL.

Elsewhere in the People Paper, Bernard Fernandez recaps the Wisconsin-Penn State and interviews some alums who aren't too concerned about the various controversies this season.

On the national scene, Mike Kern breaks down how Ohio State and South Florida rose to the top of the BCS standings, and writes his usual Monday wrap of all the big local and national action.

In the Inquirer, Frank Fitzpatrick writes the second part of his series on college athletics fundraising. It takes a hard look at controversial Oklahoma State booster T. Boone Pickens, as well as a few glances at big money that has come to Penn State and Temple recently.

Jeff McLane writes about Penn State's big uglies in the trenches, and their big role in the Wisconsin win, and wonders whether College GameDay will show up for the Ohio State game. It wouldn't surprise me; it also wouldn't surprise me if the show goes to Columbus this week.

And speaking of the Nittany Lions, Mel Greenberg looks at the women's hoops squad's first season under new coach Coquese Washington.

Now for the local Sagarin chart:

24. Penn State (28) - home win vs. Wisconsin (44)
38. Rutgers (39) - road win vs. Syracuse (115)
109. Delaware (99) - home win vs. Northeastern (165)
111. Villanova (113) - road loss vs. Massachusetts (82)
124. Temple (141) - road win vs. Akron (94)
148. Lehigh (141) - road loss at Yale (90)
155. Delaware State (161) - road win at North Carolina A&T (239)
175. Lafayette (164) - road loss at Harvard (146)
187. Penn (184) - road win at Columbia (224)
242. La Salle (242) - road loss at Marist (236)

If you're a Temple fan, you're ecstatic that your team beat a Top 100 team on the road and got the kind of jump it deserves for it. And maybe you can start to dream of jumping Villanova with another win or two if the Wildcats don't run the table.

If you're a Villanova fan, you're hopefully satisfied with how your team played, not least because UMass is the fifth-highest I-AA team in Sagarin. You're also probably really looking forward to that Delaware game at the end of the season, and perhaps wondering if a playoff berth might be at stake that night if you do run the table.

If you're a Penn fan, you're even more scared of Yale running back Mike McLeod than you already were, because he's the biggest reason why the Ivy League has a Top 100 team in a pretty bad year overall for the league. And you're even more aware of just how bad Columbia is when your team wins a road game but falls two spots in the ranking.

If you're anyone else, you see how hard it is to move up if all you do is beat a bad team. And if you're me, you're an idiot, but you've been called worse plenty of times before.

After the jump, the national Top 10 table.

This week, we swap out the Harris poll for the first BCS rankings of the year...

Rank
AP
Coaches
BCS
Sagarin
1.
Ohio State
Ohio State
Ohio State
Ohio State
2.
South Florida
Boston College
South Florida
LSU
3.
Boston College
South Florida
Boston College
South Florida
4.
Oklahoma
Oklahoma
LSU
Kansas
5.
LSU
LSU
Oklahoma
West Virginia
6.
South Carolina
Oregon
South Carolina
Oklahoma
7.
Oregon
West Virginia
Kentucky
Arizona State
8.
Kentucky
South Carolina
Arizona State
Oregon
9.
West Virginia
USC*
West Virginia
Kentucky
10.
California
California*
Oregon
Florida

* Cal and USC have 983 points each.

So which one do you think is right?

Comments (7)

Fred :

Since my alma mater is nowhere near the Top 100 in the Sagarin, I have the following position:

It really doesnt matter where we are. We arent that good, dont pretend we are that good, and its really "water under the bridge" where we fall.

Hypothetically, ff we jumped from 92 to 70, I wouldnt be that happy. Or if we dropped from 110 to 132, I wouldnt be that upset.

That being said, I am curious about the 3 programs you mentioned today.

Temple may be improving, but they are still pretty bad in the big picture.

Villanova and Penn also know where they stand.

Villanova could improve but still falls into the middle of the pack, as per the rankings.

And so what does it really matter if Penn is 184 or 187? They appear to be a subpar team (sadly) in a very subpar conference this season.

And of course, they are not going anywhere at the end of the season, since Ivy League doesnt allow post-season play in football. I suppose this really only impacts the conference winner. Not as if Columbia or one of the other bottom feeders have to worry about this.

Do you honestly think Penn fans care about this stat?

Or better yet, do Penn fans even care? Based on attendance at Franklin Field, the answer speaks for itself


Zach Klitzman:

In response to Fred, I do care about Penn's ranking. I'm a current undergrad at Penn, and even if we don't fill up Franklin Field, that doesn't mean we don't care about the program. (I guarantee you no other Philadelphia area school could fill up Franklin Field either.) While you're correct the Ivy League champion doesn't go to the playoffs, that doesn't mean the regular season is a complete waste (although I definitely hate this restriction).

Judging by your comments about your alma mater not being near the top 100, I assume you went to La Salle. Well just because your school is the worst team in D-I, and thus probably nobody cares about the team, doesn't mean other schools don't care.

Zach Klitzman
Penn Class of 2010.

Fred:


To Zach K

What makes you think that I did attend LaSalle?

I merely said, "Since my alma mater is nowhere near the Top 100 in the Sagarin"

I said nothing to the effect that I attended one of the local school, which JT covers so well.

So I am curious as to what drove you to make that assumption.

On another note, I am just as curious for your explanation as to why YOU FEEL the Penn students do not show up ON THE WHOLE to support their football team.

Based on what I have been told, and see in the attendance, the student body ON THE WHOLE does not show up to the games.

Looking forward to your response.

Best
Fred
_____ University
Class of 1992

Jonathan Tannenwald [TypeKey Profile Page]:

If I may waddle in here for a minute...

Fred, I've actually heard the opposite from people who go to Penn games -- the students show up but very few other people do. If the Georgetown game I covered was any indication, it looked like there were one or two sections of students and the rest of the place was pretty well empty.

I've heard before from Penn people that a lot of the Penn students don't care about sports. This is also reflected in their basketball student section, which pales in comparison to St. Joe's and Villanova -- both of which have far smaller undergraduate enrollments. And they don't show up early the way those two fan bases do.

Having said that, I have a hard time believing people go to Penn to be fans at basketball and football games...

Jonathan Tannenwald [TypeKey Profile Page]:

And I should add that I have no idea where Fred went to school and don't really care, but I wasn't assuming La Salle.

Wasn't assuming Texas or USC either, though.

Fred:

One or two sections out of a student population of 10,138 undergrad is pretty sparse in my book...


I would think the undergrads would show up with more strength than the 1-2 sections.

I can understand why the alumni dont show up -- the composition of the base is much more national than regional.


Citation to
http://www.upenn.edu/about/facts.php

Jack:

I'm somewhat familiar with Penn football and can tell you that there are a few things that hurt Penn's ability to draw student football fans. First, and I hope this doesn't come across as racIST, merely racIAL, but football always seemed to me to do well in the white and black demographics. Penn has a lot of students, whether they be Asian-American, Indian-American, etc. or among the large contingent of foreign-born students, who just don't care about football. Villanova, for instance, doesn't have that in such high numbers. So maybe a better comparison would be to other schools in the conference, which also have large non-white, non-black American populations and large foreign populations.


Second, I think football isn't promoted nearly as well as basketball, which the campus seems to rally around to a greater degree. And the third reason is that a large number of Penn students get drunk on Friday nights and don't do well rolling out of bed for noon games. Although that's probably the case at most schools that insist on playing early in the day.

Post a comment

Philly.com discussions are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic.

These boards are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable to us in our sole discretion and to disclose any information necessary to satisfy the law, regulation, or government request. Personal attacks, especially on other board participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Copyright © 2006-2008 Philadelphia Newspapers L.L.C. All Rights Reserved.

Author

headshot_011908.jpg

Jonathan Tannenwald is a producer with Philly.com.

I fell in love with the Big 5 at first sight upon moving to Philadelphia in 2002. At various points in my journalistic career, I've covered all six of the region's Division I teams. During that time, I've eaten many soft pretzels from the Palestra's concession stands, which is how this blog got its name.

In addition to the blog, I host and produce the Inquirer's College HoopsCast. It's a weekly podcast that features all the latest news and analysis from around local and national college basketball. Regular guests include Inquirer writers Mike Jensen, Joe Juliano and Mel Greenberg.

I also occasionally contribute to the Inquirer's women's basketball weblog, Women's Hoops Guru. If you've come here from there, this blog deals mostly with the men's side of things, though I do write about women's basketball and other sports when they fit in.

When not focusing on college hoops, I host and produce the Inquirer's PhilliesCast with Phillies beat writer Todd Zolecki, and can occasionally be found behind the camera shooting videos of the Eagles, other professional sports teams and the tiger cubs at the zoo.

One of the great things about City Series basketball, and college basketball as a whole, is its sense of community. So I want to hear from you. Post a comment or send me an email by clicking on my name above. But don't be profane, and don't post hate speech. I'm sure you'd like to take a shot at that commenter on the opposite side of a rivalry from you, or say something nasty about a team you don't like. But this blog isn't the place for it. Thanks.

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here

Add to Technorati Favorites

The latest college sports news from Philly.com

    Blogroll

    Polls and stats

    The blogosphere

    The local media

    The national media

    The rest of the world

    About

    This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on October 15, 2007 1:31 PM.

    The previous post in this blog was I stand corrected.

    The next post in this blog is Opening the mailbag.

    Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

    Powered by
    Movable Type 3.35