« E-mail in flight? It's coming | Main | A vision of a better passenger rail system »

Road Warrior: Happy airline analysts equates to higher fares

We take a look at how fewer airline seats for sale this winter can mean higher fares and more revenue for carriers facing higher fuel costs. Read the full story in today's print column.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.phillynews.com/inquirer/mt-tb-trythis.cgi/4408.

Comments (3)

TV:

I'm glad you asked--thank you. As one who alwqays seeks out the quiet car on Amtrak, the thought of unrestrained cell phone use on board an airplane is sobering. I would object in every way I can imagine to any serious proposal that would change current policy. The allowance for calls on the tarmac and after landing makes good sense.

Jim McCloskey:

I would think the addition of cell phones in flight would take stress to the next level.

I've been on a couple of flights, that due to a tarmac or ground delay, the captain permitted the use of cell phones. While most only made a fast call to the person wating for them at the other end of the flight to tell them of the delay, a couple would drone on and on. One woman behind me on her way to a wedding, went into a 30-minute discussion of the family feud that was about to breakout at the wedding.

If becomes a permitted activity, we will all be subject to the personal, and business calls, that we really don't want to hear.

Surveys show that an overwhelming number of travelers do not want cell phone use permitted while in flight. My question is, "Who is pushing this agenda forward knowing there is a vast majority against it?

Jim Mc

MEW:

Re your recent column about use of cells on planes, I would say 1,000
times NO! Who needs to use a phone on a plane? No one is that important. The
inane conversations we are all forced to listen to already are bad enough. But to be in a cramped space with some yahoo announcing into his phone, "they put me in F.....g coach," as my daughter-in-law's seat partner did last Friday, is something we could all hope to avoid. So, I vote no.
>

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Philly.com discussions are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic.

These boards are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable to us in our sole discretion and to disclose any information necessary to satisfy the law, regulation, or government request. Personal attacks, especially on other board participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Copyright © 2006-2008 Philadelphia Newspapers L.L.C. All Rights Reserved.

Author

Tom Belden, a former Inquirer business writer, has written about Philadelphia International Airport, airlines, the travel industry, the conventions and meetings business for 25 years. He has traveled to all 50 states and extensively in Europe and Mexico.


About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 10, 2007 10:19 AM.

The previous post in this blog was E-mail in flight? It's coming.

The next post in this blog is A vision of a better passenger rail system.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35