« Not Quite a Daily Photo | Main | More on the Obama Poster »

It's Done with Mirrors

Photography with mirrors can go two ways. A photographer either uses them as a device to shoot a self portrait (see the rail at right) or they work really hard to not show up in them.

So I was intrigued by Inquirer senior photographer Clem Murray's portrait in today's newspaper with the story of Drexel University mathematician and mirror designer Andrew Hicks.

ROAD20090112A.jpg

There are at least eight or nine mirrors - plus even more reflections of mirrors in those mirrors - but no reflections of the photographer. You can see Hicks was looking right into Clem's lens, but where is he I wondered. Was it a trick, done - with mirrors - in collusion with his expert subject?

Nope.

I asked Clem about it and (this is why I really like his picture) he did something I would never have thought of.

I know other photographers outside of journalism might Photoshop themselves out of the image, or rig up a giant black cloth backdrop like those photographers who shoot department store display windows.

What Clem did was put his camera on a tripod, set up his strobe and softbox, connected to the camera via a sync cord, composed his picture, and then simply walked away from the reflection. He put his camera on self-timer.

Simple, but it worked.

ROAD20090112b.jpgEven as a six column photo, across the whole front of the Health & Science section of the newspaper, I looked close and didn't figure it out. You can see Clem's camera in the big mirror, just behind the professor's left shoulder, looking like just some other part of his lab. Very cool. Also cool is Hick's non-reversing mirror, the one in the center of the photo with the readable newspaper print.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.phillynews.com/inquirer/mt-tb-trythis.cgi/7413.

Comments (3)

I noticed both things (camera in background and non-reversed text) before reading your post. The both stuck out a bunch to me.

TomG:

Great Albert! You've got a good eye.

I guess I didn't look at it close enough. I was expecting to see a reflection of the photographer, so therefore didn't bother to challenge myself when I didn't find it in the picture.

Expectations and assumptions - both in life and photography - can be really limiting, so glad you don't fall into that trap.

I still admire Clem's solution, as I have used many tricks trying to disguise my reflection over the years, but never thought of that one.

cheers, TomG

Stephen Crowley:

Confounded me. Great picture Clem.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Photographer

tomgralish4.jpg

Tom Gralish is a general assignment photographer at The Inquirer, concentrating on local news and self-generated feature photos. He has been at the paper since 1983, photographing everything from revolution in the Philippines to George W. Bush’s road to the White House to his Pulitzer Prize-winning photo essay of homeless people in the city.

For his photo essay on Philadelphia’s homeless, he was awarded both the Pulitzer Prize and the Robert F. Kennedy Award. During the first Gulf War, he was the photo editor in Saudi Arabia for all newspaper photographers embedded with U.S. military units.

His weekly column, "Scene on the Street," takes a look at Philadelphia's urban landscape.


About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on January 12, 2009 10:53 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Not Quite a Daily Photo.

The next post in this blog is More on the Obama Poster.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35