Now we wait.
Ryan Howard's salary arbitration hearing concluded a couple hours ago at a St. Petersburg hotel, but the result isn't expected until tomorrow. Howard is seeking $10 million. The Phillies have offered $7 million.
"It was cool," Howard said. "It was a different experience being in there, but as far as a result we'll find out tomorrow."
Houston Astros president Tal Smith prepared and presented the case for the Phillies. He runs Tal Smith Enterprises, which specializes in representing management in baseball arbitration cases.
"You don't leave happy until you have a result," Smith said. "Both sides would like to win, but it's not contentious. Really, it's not what people think. They think it's a lot of animosity, but that's not so. It's a debate about what's the appropriate salary. I don't think there's any ill feelings."
Howard gave conflicting signals afterward. He smiled often and said he was upbeat, but when asked for his take on the hearings after Smith said they weren't contentious, he said, "Ah, I don't know about that, but we'll see tomorrow."
But then in the next breath, he said, "I'm always upbeat. Did you think I'd be anything different? I'm always upbeat regardless. We went in. We had the process. We find out tomorrow how it goes, but either way it is what it is."
Service time no doubt was a big part of the Phillies' argument against Howard.
"That's certanly a major portion of the criteria," Smith said. "It's the length and consistency of the career. Basically that's what the discussion is about. There's no denying his performance. It's a question of how that slots in with the rest of the criteria."
*
Actually got booted by some "security guard" at the hotel. But me and a couple other writers snuck back in and purchased some beverages to make ourselves official paying customers. Why is there no love for the media?
*
Check out The Inquirer's video report: Jimmy Rollins meets the press.


Comments (5)
Is Tal Smith still President of the Astros, or did you leave out a modifier? That sounds like a conflict of interest.
Posted by frankenslade | February 20, 2008 7:26 PM
Posted on February 20, 2008 19:26
It's a good thing that being a baseball beat writer doesn't require much undercover work. You must have left your trench coat, fedora and sunglasses in Philly. I'm sure that you'll be ready next time.
Posted by Josh M | February 20, 2008 10:15 PM
Posted on February 20, 2008 22:15
Frank - did Todd not write "Houston Astros president Tal Smith?" What modifier did he miss? Not sure about a conflict of interest, as Smith seems to run arbitration hearings for everyone, but that does seem a little odd.
Todd - what's the story here?
BTW - I kind of picture Todd wearing the white spy outfit and Bill Conlin the black one from Spy vs Spy.
Posted by Mitch | February 21, 2008 6:38 AM
Posted on February 21, 2008 06:38
Todd, I'm glad to see you've finally come over to the "dark side" and become a true Philadelphian. Using the grammatical construction "me and a couple other writers" is definitely a regional hallmark. ;^)
Posted by Marty McPhillie | February 21, 2008 1:37 PM
Posted on February 21, 2008 13:37
I sided with the Phils vs. Howard. The extra $3 mil could've helped in other areas. Howard is a great talent but there are some obvious holes in his game (200Ks are something to whiff about!); his defense and speed don't qualify him as a 5-tooler. He produces--but he often non-produces: with the trio in front of him constantly on base, anytime he makes contact there's a shot for a ribbie. His arbitration victory raises the bar in many areas--especially re: expectations of HIM. A poor year from the lad after this and he'll be Burrellized.
Posted by Chet | February 22, 2008 11:04 AM
Posted on February 22, 2008 11:04