I did a post on my personal ranking of Philadelphia's mayor's best-to-worst (in the last 50 years) and got these two responses. One is from state Rep. Mark Cohen, who said I should have ranked Goode and Street higher. Another from a reader who says that Rizzo deserves some credit for the Gallery project.
Here are the comments:
I think that Street and Goode should be ranked ahead of Green and Tate because they both were public leaders with clear public agendas in a way that Green and Tate were not.
They also deserve credit for governing in a very inclusive manner, personally attending numerous events, and laying the basis for a politics that minimized racial conflicts.
They strived to be mayors of the whole city, and stand in contradistinction to Mayor Richard Hatcher of Gary or Mayor David Dinkins of New York, each of whom was somewhat paralyzed by identity politics. Nutter's victory owes something to the non-threatening precedents that Street and Goode established as to how a black mayor functioned as Mayor of Philadelphia.
Posted by Rep. Mark Cohen | September 16, 2007 6:53 PM
David R Smedley:
I do think Rizzo deserves some credit for, strangely enough, economic development with the Gallery. There never seems to be enough of an appreciation for that, considering that it was against his political instincts.
I also think Street would be more thought of, for his first term, due to his explicit focus on neighborhood politics, if he didn't have the issue of having followed Rendell.
And finally, doing something on the web highlighting the mayors since Home Rule would be good to educate about those prior to Rizzo since Tate and Dilworth would fall into them realm of "history".
My response: