« Presenting the Agenda: District 10, Part 2 | Main | Presenting the Agenda District 4: The Q&A portion »

District 4: A focus on education

Citizen blogger Albert Yee weighs in on the District 4 "Presenting the Agenda" forum. In Part 1, he writes:
Yee4_1_300.jpg

Approximately 50 people gathered for Feb. 25 Great Expectations District 4 agenda forum at the North Light Community Center (175 Green Lane) in hilly and narrow-streeted Manayunk/Roxborough. I sat down at a table with 5 locals, most who had been to a previous Great Expectations meeting. Barbara was especially pleased she attended the Citizens Convention in December and was looking forward to seeing how the Nutter administration does over the next year in regards to the agenda laid out by the citizens through this project. The ongoing basketball games next door in the other gym kept a steady beat throughout the night for the group to work by. The fluorescent lights kept things difficult for me to take photos. We were told that 4th District Councilman Curtis Jones Jr., 40 days into office, would be attending and hopefully At-Large Councilwoman Bondell Reynolds Brown would make it too.

Yee4_2_300.jpg

The night was actually a double booking for a community meeting on education to be led by Arte Verbrugghe, Associate Director of the NLCC. With the added group of education-minded people in the room, I decided to go to and sit with the smaller breakout group which had the Education agenda point. Group B also discussed Arts & Culture, Knowledge Economy and Poverty. The 15 member group comprised of NLCC members, young students, educators and residents quickly went through the Group B agenda points and settled on Education being the most important point upon which the other points depended to succeed.
Yee4_6_300.jpg

Billy cited the old proverb of giving a man to fish and feeding him for a day, but teaching a man to fish is to feed him for a lifetime; educating the next generation would enable them to do anything they want to do. The issue of poverty finished a distant second, but was overwhelmingly the second most important issue for the group. Diane thought that raising the minimum wage would account for the most impact.
Yee4_7_300.jpg

Two of the group members were area principals (didn't catch their schools or grade levels). Glen, at right above, thought that as more kids are held back in grades, the more likely they would be to eventually drop out. We must find ways to teach kids at the level they're currently at and continue to advance them with their age group peers.
Yee4_3_300.jpg

The gentleman at left, I believe he was an educator of some sort, spoke of keeping the kids engaged and "on the train" in school. Finding new ways to engage the new generation is crucial. The kids now are not the kids of the past and the way kids are taught must change with the times. Or else, the downward trend of dropout rates would only get worse. Moving onto questions the group could ask Councilman Jones, this gentleman wanted to know how to get more money for after school programs and summer programs. He felt strongly about education not ending at 3p and that it must continue at school after 3p, at home and over the summer. He wanted to ingrain the notion of education in today's youth and ingrain it as a lifelong journey.

Steve, whose Socialist views irked some, but found nods with others, wanted to guarantee free education for all through college. He added that healthcare should also be free for all. Glen retorted that he grew up in a country which tried Socialism (I'm guessing by his accent it was England) and he said it failed there. He thinks that if people are given things for free (like education) that they take it for granted and don't make proper use of it. He likes how things are done in America where you must work and pay for everything you want and implying that you work for the things you really want like a good education. He stressed, again, that the way we teach must be changed and that kids shouldn't be told they're wrong so often between the ages of 2 and 8, but rather, to encourage them. Arte asked about the missing PPA money for education. Barbara wanted to see how Council would get the school budget back on track in the wake of Vallas' leave.
Yee4_4_220.jpg

Harry wanted to find out what interests today's kids. And once those things are found out, to challenge them towards other things as well. Diane wanted to see more partnerships between the public and private schools; she noted that Chicago was doing this well. Arte, piggybacking on Diane's and Harry's points, wanted to build better partnerships between public sector the private sector to help the schools. Additionally, how to provide more vocational-tech options for those who don't want to go the college route or additional options for those who cannot. Tom wanted to develop a scholarship commitment from area colleges for Philadelphia's high school students. This request reminded me of a new program by freshman state legislator Tony Payton (D-179) called REACH:

Payton’s legislation would create Reliable Educational Assistance for College Hopefuls, referred to as REACH, a statewide, merit-based scholarship program for all students in Pennsylvania who maintain at least a 3.0 grade-point average and a 90 percent attendance record. The program would ensure those students would receive a scholarship covering all tuition and fees to any university in the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education.

The youngest participant of the night had some strong points to make. She wanted to make sure all schools had some kind of program to get neighborhood youth involved in their communities. Doings so expands knowledge and builds leadership. When Billy raised the issue of how to more effectively teach proper sex ed in schools, communities and religious institutions, she had more to add. I didn't catch her exact age, but I'm going to estimate she's in late middle school or early high school. She noted the number of teens pregnant she knows and how the things taught in schools don't resonate with today's youth. Sure they now know how to get STDs and the theoretical percentages of how many of her classmates have certain STDs, but kids are going to do what they want to do regardless of how much their taught. Billy pointed to new ways to reach kids - he cited a television commercial he saw with young kids in it and not adults simply telling what to do.

Wonderful discussion was had in this smaller breakout group and wonderful questions were raised. I'll cover the second half of the evening with Councilman Jones present to answer questions and talk about the 4th District in my next post.

Comments (4)

Anonymous:

If people are not referencing the collection of the $500 million in overdue property taxes, then the press has done a disservice.

While people bring up the PPA's $10 million or so in payments to schools, people don't seem to comprehend that the overdue property taxes of $500 million, if collected at sheriff sale, would go to schools as soon as the property is foreclosed upon.

Nutter's legislation to assign 60% of property taxes to schools would mean hundreds of millions in potential old, and new, property tax revenue. As old taxes are paid, new owners with up to date assessments are paying their fair share for better schools. Old assessments are wiped away when a new owner takes over ownership.

This odd lack of interest in the role of property taxes to fund schools is unusual -- elsewhere in the metropolitan region, it's well-covered by the papers.

Why is this paper so reticent to cope with the most important, elemental school financing that now exists? Property taxes pay for good schools. Uncollected property taxes, underassessed property taxes, guarantee BAD SCHOOLS.

There is no way to avoid this simple equation. Fair, updated property taxes + promptly collected overdue taxes + growing a private tax base that pays = great schools.

Anonymous:

Here's the source of the info on overdue Philadelphia property taxes:

www.hallwatch.org/proptax/about/redelinq/stats/summary

This is the result of a Freedom of Information Inquiry that requests the monthly computer file of property tax information, etc.

What it shows is how much property tax is left uncollected, unforeclosed, and never makes it to Sheriff Sale even after several years.

This is no way to leave schools. I understand that school kids don't vote and property owners do, however, is this how we want schools to stay?

It seems that there has to be a grassroots efforts by parents, students, and educators pressuring elected officials to mandate automatic auction of tax debt over a certain amount of time, over a certain amount. That way no one feels singled out. Negotiating this debt is absurd. Owners have to pay up, including fees and fines, or sell the property at sheriff sale.

Why is this issue ignored in the press as it relates to school funding?

Anonymous:

These attendees need to ask their Council reps what their position is on collecting the overdue property taxes in full and on time.

I predict that you'll be stunned by their answers.

Anonymous:

Just ask how the city can collect more in one year than the PPA will convey to schools in five by asking them how, and see if your Council reps understand how much property the city owns that it is liable for taxes on that it can't pay:

www.hallwatch.org/proptax/about/redelinq/stats/topdelinquents/mailingaddress

The City of Philadelphia owns numerous properties that rightly should be in private hands if only to not cheat schools of millions in property tax revenue. Ask these Council Reps what their plans are for selling this property openly, competitively, to the highest bidder in order to fund all school initiatives, summer school, AC in summer to make classrooms bearable, trimester style education, expanding the classroom day to 5pm, enough teachers' aides, enough requested supplies and staff, you name it.

There is no reason the city can't afford this except that it can't decisively act on coping with the log jam of properties it owns. Ditto the RDA, PIDC, PHA, Uni-Penn, and numerous other publicly funded ventures that went by the boards where private owners are willing to step in.

There has to be a realization in City Hall that good schools are paid for by a thriving tax base of private owners, whether business, residents, landlords, or others. They have to pay property taxes, while government entities don't.

Getting any government owned or controlled property back into tax paying hands has to be the priority of every parent, educator, or student who wants adequate school funding.

No one else is going to come up with this money. No one has to. Property taxes in Philly once were not possible as a sufficient source of school funds, but after a real estate boom, Philly hasn't caught up in its assessments, collections, reporting, and foreclosure policies.

We can't be weak on better schools. We have to get tough with scofflaws and foot draggers.

Post a comment

Philly.com discussions are intended to be civil, friendly conversations. Please treat other participants with respect and in a way that you would want to be treated. You are responsible for what you say. And please, stay on topic.

These boards are monitored by Philly.com staff. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable to us in our sole discretion and to disclose any information necessary to satisfy the law, regulation, or government request. Personal attacks, especially on other board participants, are not permitted. We reserve the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions.

Authors

blogart.jpg

Great Expectations is a civic engagement project brought to you by The Inquirer and the University of Pennsylvania. Check out the Great Expectations Web site.

Chris Satullo is an Inquirer columnist and former editor of The Inquirer's Editorial Page. He was a founder of the Great Expectations project, which focuses on civic engagement and the issues in Philadelphia's 2007 mayoral race.

Tom Ferrick, a former Inquirer reporter, worked on the Great Expectations project throughout 2007 and into 2008.

Other members of the Editorial Board will be weighing in on the blog, as will Harris Sokoloff and Jodie Chester Lowe, members of the Great Expectations team.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on February 26, 2008 5:01 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Presenting the Agenda: District 10, Part 2.

The next post in this blog is Presenting the Agenda District 4: The Q&A portion.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35